Two Phase 3 clinical trials. Two different chemotherapy regimens. One focus: VYLOY + chemotherapy to help improve survival.1

efficacy banner desktop
efficacy banner mobile

PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL

In GLOW, VYLOYTM (zolbetuximab) + CAPOX significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS)1

Median PFS was 8.2 months with VYLOY + CAPOX vs 6.8 months with CAPOX alone (HR=0.69 [95% CI: 0.54-0.87]; P=0.0007).1

PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL (PRIMARY ENDPOINT)1*

glow graph 1 desktop
glow graph 1 mobile

Sustained benefits in PFS were also seen at 12, 18, and 24 months (vs CAPOX alone)1

Duration VYLOY + CAPOX Placebo + CAPOX
At 12 months 35% 19%
At 18 months 24% 11%
At 24 months 14% 7%

*PFS was assessed per RECIST v1.1 by independent review committee.1

CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio.

Overall survival (OS) was also significantly extended with first-line VYLOY + CAPOX1

In GLOW, median OS was 14.4 months with VYLOY + CAPOX vs 12.2 months with CAPOX alone (HR=0.77 [95% CI: 0.62-0.97]; 1-sided P=0.0118).1

OVERALL SURVIVAL (SECONDARY ENDPOINT)1

glow graph 2 desktop
glow graph 2 mobile
OS benefits were sustained at 12, 18, and 24 months (vs CAPOX alone)1
Duration VYLOY + CAPOX
Placebo + CAPOX
At 12 Months 58% 51%
At 18 Months 38% 28%
At 24 Months 29% 17%

Response rates were similar between treatment arms1*

VYLOY + CAPOX demonstrated a higher complete response rate (3.5%) vs CAPOX alone (1.5%).1

OBJECTIVE RESPONSE RATE (SECONDARY ENDPOINT)1

glow graph 3 desktop
glow graph 3 mobile

Median duration of response (mDOR) was similar across treatment arms (6.1 months with VYLOY + CAPOX vs 6.1 months with CAPOX alone).1

MEDIAN DURATION OF RESPONSE (SECONDARY ENDPOINT)1

glow graph 4 desktop
glow graph 4 mobile

*Assessed in the full analysis set, which comprised all randomised patients.
 

ORR was assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) per RECIST v1.1.1

DOR was assessed by IRC per RECIST v1.1.1

CR=complete response; ORR=objective response rate; PR=partial response.

In the GLOW Phase 3 trial, VYLOY + CAPOX was evaluated against CAPOX alone1

VYLOY is a first-in-class CLDN18.2-targeted therapy studied with the CAPOX chemotherapy regimen in a double-blind, randomised, global, multicentre study.1

glow graph 5 desktop
glow graph 5 mobile

Eligibility Criteria

  • ECOG performance status 0 or 1
  • Radiological evaluable disease per RECIST 1.1
  • Adequate organ function

SELECT Exclusion Criteria

  • Received prior treatment for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma
  • Significant cardiovascular disease#
  • Complete or partial gastric outlet syndrome
  • Hepatitis B or C infection
  • History of CNS metastases

*Tumour expresses CLDN18.2 in ≥75% of tumour cells demonstrating moderate to strong membranous staining as determined by central IHC testing.1
 

HER2-negative tumour as determined by local or central testing on a gastric or GEJ tumour specimen.1
 

No prior systemic chemotherapy.1
 

§VYLOY was administered at a loading dose of 800 mg/m2 IV on Cycle 1 Day 1 followed by 600 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks. Additionally, subjects received CAPOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) treatment for a total of 8 cycles (21 days per cycle) until confirmed disease progression. Oxaliplatin was administered on Day 1 of each cycle, whereas capecitabine was taken twice daily on Days 1 through 14. After a maximum of 8 treatments of oxaliplatin, subjects may continue to receive capecitabine twice daily on Days 1 through 14 of each cycle at the investigator’s discretion until the subject meets study treatment discontinuation criteria. Patients were allowed to continue treatment with VYLOY and capecitabine at the discretion of the investigator, until disease progression, development of toxic effects, start of another anticancer treatment, or other discontinuation criteria were met, as specified in the protocol.1
 

||Placebo was administered on Cycle 1 Day 1 and every 3 weeks thereafter. Additionally, subjects received CAPOX (capecitabine/oxaliplatin) treatment for a total of 8 cycles (21 days per cycle) until confirmed disease progression.  Oxaliplatin was administered on Day 1 of each cycle, whereas capecitabine was taken twice daily on Days 1 through 14. After a maximum of 8 treatments of oxaliplatin, subjects may continue to receive capecitabine twice daily on Days 1 through 14 of each cycle at the investigator’s discretion until the subject meets study treatment discontinuation criteria. Patients were allowed to continue treatment with VYLOY and capecitabine at the discretion of the investigator, until disease progression, development of toxic effects, start of another anticancer treatment, or other discontinuation criteria were met, as specified in the protocol.1
 

Does not include all patient inclusion and exclusion criteria for the GLOW trial.1
 

#Congestive heart failure (defined as New York Heart Association Class III or IV), history of significant ventricular arrhythmias, QTc interval >450 msec for males; >470 msec for females.1

CLDN18.2=Claudin18.2; CNS=central nervous system; ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; G/GEJ=gastric/gastro-oesophageal junction; HER2=human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HIV=human immunodeficiency virus; QTc=heart rate—corrected QT interval; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours.

GLOW patient population1
glow-patient-population-table
GLOW: Safety data

Adverse reactions reported in ≥15% of patients1

TREATMENT-EMERGENT ADVERSE EVENTS (TEAEs)1 VYLOY + CAPOX (n=254)
 PLACEBO + CAPOX (n=253)

ANY GRADE, n (%) GRADE ≥3, n (%) ANY GRADE, n (%) GRADE ≥3, n (%)
Any adverse event 251 (98.8) 185 (72.8) 244 (98.0) 174 (69.9)
Nausea 174 (68.5) 22 (8.7) 125 (50.2) 6 (2.4)
Vomiting 168 (66.1) 31 (12.2) 77 (30.9) 9 (3.6)
Decreased appetite 105 (41.3) 17 (6.7) 84 (33.7) 4 (1.6)
Anaemia 90 (35.4) 27 (10.6) 91 (36.5) 28 (11.2)
Diarrhoea 80 (31.5) 15 (5.9) 86 (34.5) 18 (7.2)
Neutrophil count decreased 70 (27.6) 26 (10.2)
 59 (23.7) 24 (9.6)

Aspartate aminotransferase increased 63 (24.8) 6 (2.4)

 72 (28.9) 7 (2.8)
Platelet count decreased  61 (24.0) 19 (7.5)
 60 (24.1) 20 (8.0)

Hypoalbuminemia 57 (22.4) 8 (3.1) 35 (14.1) 4 (1.6)
Peripheral sensory neuropathy  56 (22.0) 1 (0.4)
 56 (22.5) 6 (2.4)

White blood cell count decreased  51 (20.1) 5 (2.0)
 39 (15.7) 9 (3.6)

Neutropenia 50 (19.7) 18 (7.1) 35 (14.1) 7 (2.8)
Weight decreased 50 (19.7) 1 (0.4) 25 (10.0) 1 (0.4)
Alanine aminotransferase increased  48 (18.9) 2 (0.8) 52 (20.9) 7 (2.8)


Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia  41 (16.1) 4 (1.6)
 49 (19.7) 9 (3.6)

Abdominal pain 40 (15.7) 1 (0.4) 54 (21.7) 4 (1.6)
Constipation 39 (15.4) - 52 (20.9) -
Fatigue 34 (13.4) 7 (2.8) 42 (16.9) 9 (3.6)
  • Serious TEAEs: 47.2% with VYLOY + CAPOX vs 49.8% with CAPOX alone
  • TEAEs leading to discontinuation of VYLOY or placebo: 20.1% with VYLOY + CAPOX vs 14.5% with CAPOX alone1
  • Fatal TEAEs were reported in 10.6% of patients with VYLOY + CAPOX (vs 12.9% in patients with CAPOX alone)1

Nausea and vomiting occurred more often during the first cycle of treatment but decreased in incidence with subsequent treatment cycles.1

Find out how IHC testing for CLDN18.2 helps identify patients who may be candidates for VYLOY + chemotherapy.

IHC=immunohistochemistry.

References:

  1. Shah MA, Shitara K, Ajani JA, et al. Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX in CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized,phase 3 GLOW trial. Nat Med 2023;29:2133-41.